Unheard Child
← All states

Mississippi

Miss. Code § 43-21-353Mississippi mandatory-reporting statute

Clergy named as mandatory reporter?
Yes
Confessional exemption?
Yes
Statute
Miss. Code § 43-21-353
Clergy named
Expressly
Pending

Mississippi names ministers as mandatory reporters by statute, and willful failure to report carries up to a $5,000 fine and one year in jail under Miss. Code § 43-21-353(7). The reporting duty also reaches 'any other person' with reasonable cause to suspect abuse, neglect, commercial sexual exploitation, or trafficking. What the statute does not do is address what happens when a church invokes the separately-codified clergy-penitent privilege at Miss. Code § 13-1-22 and Miss. R. Evid. 505. The reporting statute names the reporter and sets the penalty. It says nothing about whether a confession or pastoral conversation counts as a triggering disclosure, and the privilege statute remains fully operative in court. Mississippi has the reporting duty most states are still pushing to enact. Closing the silence on whether the privilege survives in court is the work UCO is pushing in Mississippi and every state that left the conflict unresolved.

Section 01What needs to change

What needs to change in Mississippi.

  • Clergy expressly named at § 43-21-353(1)

    Subsection (1) lists 'minister' alongside attorneys, physicians, dentists, nurses, psychologists, social workers, child caregivers, law enforcement, and public or private school employees as mandatory reporters. The same subsection extends the duty to **'any other person'** with reasonable cause to suspect a child is neglected, abused, commercially sexually exploited, or trafficked. Mississippi pairs an enumerated professional list with an all-person catchall, so clergy are named twice over.

    View source ↗
  • Criminal penalty at § 43-21-353(7)

    Willful violation of any provision of § 43-21-353, including a mandated reporter's failure to report, is punishable by a fine up to **$5,000**, imprisonment up to **one year**, or both. The Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services quotes this penalty alongside the reporter list on its public reporting page. The penalty applies to ministers by operation of subsection (1)'s enumeration.

    View source ↗
  • Clergy-penitent privilege is preserved by a separate statute

    Mississippi codifies a clergy-penitent privilege at **Miss. Code § 13-1-22** and **Miss. R. Evid. 505**, giving the penitent and derivatively the clergy member a privilege over confidential communications to a clergyman acting as spiritual adviser. Section 43-21-353 contains no exception that preserves or overrides that privilege in the reporting context. A Harvard Program on Biblical Law analysis groups Mississippi with Connecticut as states that 'do not clearly address the potential conflict between the priest-penitent privilege and mandatory reporting.'

    View source ↗
  • 'Reasonable cause to suspect' attaches the moment it exists

    The Mississippi Court of Appeals held in **Howe v. Andereck** that 'the duty to report suspected child abuse attaches to an individual the moment they are presented with a situation producing reasonable cause for such suspicion.' The standard governs every enumerated reporter under § 43-21-353(1), including ministers. The Mississippi Supreme Court added in **Watkins v. Mississippi Department of Human Services** that reporters need not use 'magic words' like 'report,' 'abuse,' or 'neglect' to satisfy the statute, so informal disclosures of concern can constitute compliance.

    View source ↗
  • Recent sessions did not touch the clergy provision

    Five bills in the 2025 and 2026 regular sessions cited § 43-21-353 (HB1231, HB1367, HB860, HB1498, HB1568). None modified the reporter list or addressed the privilege ambiguity, and all five died in committee. The legislative silence on the clergy carveout is itself current.

    View source ↗
Section 02What's needed

What it takes to close the gap.

Section 03How you can help

Concrete ways to support reform in Mississippi.

Donate

Donate.

Donations fund Mississippi-specific research and coalition outreach as advocates push for statutory language that resolves the privilege ambiguity.

Mission supportDonate
Section 04Timeline

How Mississippi got here.

  • 2004
    Howe v. Andereck sets the reasonable-cause trigger

    The Mississippi Court of Appeals holds that the § 43-21-353 reporting duty attaches the moment reasonable cause to suspect child abuse exists. The standard applies to every enumerated reporter, including ministers.

    View source ↗
  • 2014
    Watkins v. MS DHS clarifies what counts as a report

    The Mississippi Supreme Court rules that reporters need not use 'magic words' to satisfy § 43-21-353. Informal disclosures of concern can constitute compliance with the statutory duty.

    View source ↗
  • 2025
    HB1367 would have added a law-enforcement reporting channel

    Introduced in the 2025 Regular Session. Would have required mandatory reporters to also contact local law enforcement in parallel with reporting to MDCPS. Preserved the existing reporter list including 'minister' and made no change to the privilege ambiguity. Died in committee.

    View source ↗
  • 2026
    Multiple § 43-21-353 amendments fail in committee

    Therapist-patient bills HB1498 and HB1568 cite § 43-21-353 as an amended section but address therapist conduct, not clergy reporting. Both die in committee on February 3, 2026. No 2025 or 2026 bill targets the privilege ambiguity directly.

    View source ↗
Section 05Key cases

Litigation shaping the law.

  • Howe v. Andereck

    882 So.2d 240 (Miss. Ct. App. 2004)2004

    Mississippi Court of Appeals decision setting the operative 'reasonable cause to suspect' standard under § 43-21-353. The duty to report attaches the moment a person is presented with a situation producing reasonable cause for suspicion of child abuse. The standard governs every enumerated reporter under subsection (1), including the statute's expressly-named 'minister.' Cited by the Mississippi Bar's mandatory-reporting compilation and RAINN's state-laws database as the leading interpretive authority.

    View source ↗
  • Watkins v. Mississippi Department of Human Services

    132 So.3d 1037 (Miss. 2014)2014

    Mississippi Supreme Court decision arising from a wrongful-death action after a child died of starvation in DHS-arranged care. The court clarified that reporters need not use 'magic words' such as 'report,' 'abuse,' or 'neglect' to satisfy § 43-21-353. Medical personnel who told DHS the child was likely being starved had triggered the reporting framework. The case lowers the threshold for what counts as compliance and is relevant to clergy under the same enumerated-reporter framework.

    View source ↗
Section 06Background

Public-record sources UCO is tracking.

Always verify against the underlying statute or filing before quoting.

  • Justia US Law (2024 Mississippi Code)· 2024
    Miss. Code § 43-21-353 — Duty to inform state agencies and officials

    Principal statute. Subsection (1) expressly enumerates 'minister' among mandatory reporters and extends the duty to 'any other person' with reasonable cause. Subsection (7) sets the criminal penalty at up to $5,000 fine and one year jail for willful violation. Mississippi's legislature does not host the codified statute on its own domain, so the Justia rendering is used as the canonical free-access source; FindLaw mirrors the same text.

    View source ↗
  • Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services· 2026
    Reporting Child Abuse and Neglect — Mississippi Department of Child Protection Services

    Official state agency page implementing § 43-21-353. Quotes the reporter list verbatim including 'minister' and states the § 43-21-353(7) criminal penalty. MDCPS is the agency receiving reports under the statute, so the page is the operative public-facing summary.

    View source ↗
  • Justia US Law· 2024
    Miss. Code § 13-1-22 — Confidentiality of priest-penitent communications

    Separate evidence statute recognizing the clergy-penitent privilege over confidential communications to a clergyman acting as spiritual adviser. Read alongside § 43-21-353, it supports the 'silent' privilege posture: the reporting statute names ministers but does not address whether the privilege survives in the reporting context.

    View source ↗
  • Child Welfare Information Gateway, U.S. HHS Children's Bureau· May 2023
    Clergy as Mandatory Reporters of Child Abuse and Neglect — Mississippi

    Federal HHS state-statute summary citing § 43-21-353. States that any minister with reasonable cause must report and that privileged communications are 'not addressed in the statutes reviewed.' Authoritative federal cross-reference for both the expressly-named status and the silent privilege posture.

    View source ↗
  • The Mississippi Bar· 2018
    Mandatory Reporting Statutes (Mississippi Bar)

    Mississippi Bar reference compiling the reporting framework. Reproduces the § 43-21-353(1) reporter list including 'minister' and the § 43-21-355 immunity provisions, and cites Watkins v. MS DHS and Howe v. Andereck as the leading appellate gloss on the reasonable-cause trigger.

    View source ↗
  • Harvard Law School, Program on Biblical Law & Christian Legal Studies (Thackston)
    The Priest-Penitent Privilege in a Post-Scandal World

    Scholarly analysis cataloging states whose statutory regimes interact with the clergy-penitent privilege. Explicitly groups Mississippi with Connecticut as states that 'do not clearly address the potential conflict between the priest-penitent privilege and mandatory reporting.' Independent academic confirmation of the silent posture and discusses Roman Catholic Diocese v. Morrison, in which the Mississippi Supreme Court applied the privilege in litigation involving alleged abuse of three minors.

    View source ↗
  • Mississippi Legislature Bill Status System· 2025
    Mississippi HB1231 (2025 Regular Session) — Bill History

    HB1231 amended § 97-5-39 to address controlled-substance exposure at birth and brought forward § 43-21-353 without modifying the reporter list or addressing the privilege ambiguity. Referred to House Judiciary B on 01/20/2025; died in committee 02/04/2025. Disposition: Dead.

    View source ↗
  • Mississippi Legislature Bill Status System· 2025
    Mississippi HB860 (2025 Regular Session) — Bill History

    HB860 created therapist-patient sexual contact offenses and amended § 43-21-353 to extend immunity protections for abuse reporters, without modifying the clergy reporter list or addressing the privilege ambiguity. Referred to House Judiciary B on 01/16/2025; died in committee 02/04/2025. Disposition: Dead.

    View source ↗
  • BillTrack50 / Mississippi Legislature Bill Status System· 2026
    Mississippi HB1568 (2026 Regular Session), therapists and sexual-contact felony; amends 43-21-353

    HB1568 would have amended Section 43-21-353 to provide immunity for reporters of sexual abuse but died in committee on February 3, 2026 (the House committee-report deadline per the 2026 session timetable). Closes the HB1568 citation gap in the five-bill characterization.

    View source ↗
  • Mississippi Supreme Court (courts.ms.gov)· 2025
    Mississippi Rules of Evidence, Rule 505, Communications to Clergy

    Rule 505 establishes that a person has a privilege to refuse to disclose and to prevent another from disclosing a confidential communication made to a clergyman in his professional character as spiritual adviser. The privilege belongs to the communicant; the clergy member holds it derivatively. The court-promulgated evidence rule that operates alongside the codified Section 13-1-22 privilege statute.

    View source ↗
Last reviewed May 29, 2026 · by Unheard Child Org research teamHow we track this

If you need help right now:

  • RAINN1-800-656-HOPENational Sexual Assault Hotline. 24/7, free, confidential.
  • 988Dial 988Suicide & Crisis Lifeline. 24/7, free, confidential.
  • Childhelp1-800-422-4453National Child Abuse Hotline. 24/7, free, multilingual.

The Quick exit button opens a neutral page, but it does not erase your browser history. For safer browsing, use a private window or a trusted device, and clear your history when it is safe to do so.

Donate